Evaluating – WCU ENT640 Entrepreneurial Feasibility Analysis.

“In both entrepreneurship and angel investing, there is nothing like doing it. Nothing.” (Amis and Stephenson, p. 75.)  This implies that when evaluating your opportunities, your knowledge and ability to determine a good deal will increase with your experience of taking the steps of investing.  I think a similar statement can be made about being an entrepreneur.  There is no end to planning and evaluating, we can direct as much time as we want to this.  For may of us, and I mean me, a process of analyzing anything can be a paralyzing event that causes us not to act.  The best part of the “Winning Angels”, is that it provides a detailed framework in all its 7 fundamentals.  The path of evaluating and decision making laid given to us in much detail from Amis and Stephenson can be used both by us as entrepreneurs as well as the Angel Investors that it was meant for.  Although, Amis and Stephenson preface the decision-making framework with stating “Good judgement comes from experience and experience comes from making bad judgements,” the evaluating process they lay out can help many of us come to a decision. 

Start-up Entrepreneurs and Angel Investors seem to have a similar restraint in capital, time, and resources such as social capital.  We may not have the luxury of making a “bad judgement” for the sake of gaining experience.  Limited capital coupled with a low level of social expertise to rely upon restricts us from a wrong decision.  However, Amis and Stephenson separates success or failure from the evaluation process.  They state that a huge win with a single 1990’s internet start-up does not prove that the investor knows anything about early-stage startups, as well as the inverse if you were to lose 10 times on an investment you may also not know anything.  The process helps but experience in deal making is what give you the insight to deal making. 

This biggest takeaway for me in the Evaluating section is how to assess and manage risk.  Angel Randy Komisar (Amis and Stephenson, 2001, p. 105) states that “I go in and invest my time to remove the risk that I know how to remove.  And then I pass it on the operating guys to take out the next level of risk.”  The book moves on to examine different types of risk but to me the real lesson is the importance of Social Capital to involve other Angels with different backgrounds and expertise as well as put together teams that work cohesively together for a broader experience.   

The Harvard Framework is one of the focal points of this fundamental.  Amis and Stephenson give the reading Angels a guidepost to connect, define, and evaluate their opportunities.  The Harvard Framework originally developed by the Author Howard Stephenson in Harvard Business School and since has been further developed to be utilized in many other facets of business.  The framework focuses of four elements, People, Business Opportunity, Deal, and Context.  A good deal would be one that there is a relevant level of each of the four elements and they work cohesively together to create the opportunity for success.  The absence of one of the elements would lead to a bad deal and opportunity for failure.  The way they interact with one another being the crucial measurement for the opportunity for success, the Context of the deal being the larger, macro environment the deal resides with the other three elements of the deal being a recipe for the success.

Again, this fundamental provides the guideline and boundaries for an Angel to connect, define, and evaluate their deals.  Giving definition to critical points that will indicate to them if a deal is correct for them as well as helping the Angel to create an overall strategy and mission.  All the while, we are given the opportunity to learn from the viewpoint of the Angel Investor. 

Reference:

Amis, D., & Stevenson, H. H. (2001). Winning angels: the seven fundamentals of early-stage investing. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

9 thoughts on “Evaluating – WCU ENT640 Entrepreneurial Feasibility Analysis.

  1. I really like your summary of the evaluating section of the book. I like that the quote you brought out about getting experience by making bad judgments. I do not have money at the time for bad judgements do I find investing very scary. I am sure that investing just gets easier with a little experience but I am not willing to lose my hard-earned money to get the experience. You writing and summary of the chapter were very clear.

    Tina Jones

    Like

    1. Thanks for reviewing Tina! I say all the time that I can make an investment but I can’t afford a loss. What little money I have I grinded out and wouldn’t have enough time to grind out more. Good luck!

      Like

  2. Jeremy,
    The sentence “Good judgement comes from experience and experience comes from making bad judgements,” resonates with me because that is so true for me in my work. Also, the section from Randy Komisar talking about analyzing and removing the risks that he knows about, and then passing it on to the operations guy to remove the next risk is familiar as well. Having the right people is just as important as the other components, if not more.

    Like

  3. Jeramy,

    As someone who works in student affairs and is constantly having to evaluate risks, this section and your post really stood out to me. It’s almost eye opening to think about the levels ideas go through to decrease risks. Whether it be in a business decision or decisions you have to make every day which will impact your future career and personal life. It’s always beneficial to lean on others to assist in this task, but I think it is important to forever be fine-tuning your own skills along the way.

    Like

  4. Hey Jeramy! Nice to talk to you again. I found that what stuck out to me the most was taking risks as well. It’s important to understand that the risk may not go the way we had hoped. We do not know this though unless we give it a shot. It would be better to have tried and failed, and learn from that, then to look back and never try anything, and wonder “what if?” This also reminds me of this important question- What would we do if we could not fail?

    Like

  5. Jeramy,

    Evaluating is very critical to the success of your company. Mitigating risk is also important. Winning Angels gives some great examples on reducing risk. I think there will always be some level of risk with any venture. Sometimes we must press past our fears and take a risk. Failure is relevant to one’s personal experience and opinion. In my opinion it is a stepping stone to success. I enjoyed your post.

    Best,
    Shannon

    Like

  6. Great post. I like how you referenced the book excerpt related to hitting it big with some 90s internet startup, as I think the point the author made rings very true. There are few teachers as effective as failure, and getting lucky and hitting it big one time is a recipe for growing an inflated ego and overestimating your skills. And while utilizing tools like the Harvard Framework can go a long way in mitigating the potential for disaster, in the end nothing can substitute for the often intangible skills you develop by actually doing something.

    Like

  7. Hi Jeramy,

    I like your focus on managing the risk you know how to manage, but also finding, and working with others who can manage the risk you don’t know. The importance of social capital is in almost every class at this point, because it is so important. You also pointed out the easy to follow framework about how to evaluate an opportunity, great post.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: